- Report this article
Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA
Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA
President and CEO, Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, another lousy golfer, terrible cook, friction fixer
Published Oct 4, 2022
+ Follow
A recent article described the termination of an NYU organic chemistry professor in response to a student petition. When the professor pushed students’ grades down, noting the egregious misconduct, he said they protested that “they were not given grades that would allow them to get into medical school.” The reporter noted that, in short, this one unhappy chemistry class could be a case study of the pressures on higher education as it tries to handle its Gen-Z student body. Should universities ease pressure on students, many of whom are still coping with the pandemic’s effects on their mental health and schooling? How should universities respond to the increasing number of complaints by students against professors? Do students have too much power over contract faculty members, who do not have the protections of tenure?
And how hard should organic chemistry be anyway? One faculty member said, “Unless you appreciate these transformations at the molecular level, I don’t think you can be a good physician, and I don’t want you treating patients.”
But how about artificial intelligence as a major? Though many workers view generative artificial intelligence as a threat to white-collar jobs, younger generations hope to build careers around the technology. Enter undergraduate AI-engineering programs, with the University of Pennsylvania on Tuesday becoming the first Ivy League school to say it will offer the major in the fall. Robert Ghrist, an associate dean at Penn Engineering, acknowledged in a statement that the program is challenging to design — and pursue. “We are training students for jobs that don’t yet exist in fields that may be completely new or revolutionized by the time they graduate,” he said.
I know the feeling. While organic chemistry is termed a "doctor killer" by premedical students, getting any grade less than an "A", typically in science, technology, engineering, or math subjects, can doom your application. When I saw that B I got in physics in my junior year of college, I started thinking about Plan B. Then I really learned the gravity of the situation.
Despite the noise and groaning,medical school applications continue to grow,driven by many factors.However, the medical school education model dates back to the Flexner report issued in 1910.. Many are trying to address the challenges ofhow to train the biomedical research and practice workforce to win the 4th industrial revolution,but progress has been slow.Here were the challenges facing medical schools in 2015.Things have not radically changed. Medical educators. particularly those in public medical schools will continue to face several basic problems in the coming years. The "invisible enemy" has exacerbated many.
We should rethink how we recruit and accept medical students.
Here are some questions that should inform that transition:
3. Do patients really care what grade their doctor got in organic chemistry, or, for that matter, whether they graduated last in their class from medical school?
4. How has the pandemic and the persona of Gen Z changed medical education?
5. What do doctors and patients need to know to win the 4th industrial revolution? Organic chemistry?
Recommended by LinkedIn
6. How does the present system and its reliance on undergraduate STEM academic performance impact inequitable socioeconomic and demographic acceptance rates?
7. How should we transform premedical, medical, and post-graduate pedagogy? Examples are project-based learning and peer reviewed feedback.
9. Is the purpose of a medical school education solely to graduate students who have the knowledge, skills, abilities, and competencies to take care of patients, or, should we provide them with exit ramps too?
10. How do we balance a medical culture of conformity with a culture of creativity?
12. What do we need to learn about cognitive science as it applies to medical decision making?
If everyone outside hard-core engineering, math or pre-med courses can easily get an A, the whole system loses meaning. It fails to make distinctions between different levels of achievement or to motivate students to work hard on their academic pursuits. All the while, it allows students to pretend—to themselves and to others—that they are performing exceptionally well. Worse, this system creates perverse incentives. To name but one, it actively punishes those who take risks by enrolling in truly challenging courses.
The ability to develop crisp mental models around the problems you want to solve and understanding the why before you start working on the how is an increasingly critical skill, especially in the age of AI. Coding is one of the things AI does best and its capabilities are quickly improving. However, there’s a catch: Code created by an AI can be syntactically and semantically correct but not functionally correct. In other words, it can work well, but not do what you want it to do. Having a crisp mental model around a problem, being able to break it down into steps that are tractable, perfect first-principle thinking, sometimes being prepared (and able to) debate a stubborn AI — these are the skills that will make a great engineer in the future, and likely the same consideration applies to many job categories, including medicine.
I'm lucky that I dodged the bullet. But I still have Plan B.
Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA is the President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs on Substack
Like
Celebrate
Support
Love
Insightful
Funny
10
21 Comments
Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA
President and CEO, Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, another lousy golfer, terrible cook, friction fixer
3mo
- Report this comment
1Reaction
Scott Ravede
--
1y
- Report this comment
Your grade in Organic Chemistry has a lot to do with who's teaching the course. Despite the fact I had a Nobel Prize winning professor, he could not teach if his life depended on it. He had no sense of organization and was constantly jumping around to talk about concepts for which he had not yet laid a foundation. I dropped the course and took it with another professor in a later semester. The difference between the two professors' teaching style was like night and day. The second professor laid out the course in a completely organized manner, proceeded logically and had great outlines to simply learning complex topics. No doubt if I hadn't dropped the first course, I would have struggled mightily to get a good grade, with much head banging involved.
1Reaction
Matt Mihelic, MD
Associate Professor at University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
1y
- Report this comment
Even Alan Dershowitz is weighing in on this subject:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQA2gd_avYU
1Reaction
marc Ringel
--
1y
- Report this comment
IMHO, the primary trait of people selected for admission to medical schools from the overwhelming pool of applicants is the ability to take tests, which depends on experience at test-taking; ability to psych out professors and, by no means wholly, on smarts.I sat on the admission committee for the University of Colorado School of Medicine.All applicants presented resumes that made them sound like a combination of Jonas Salk and Mother Teresa.When we chose newly minted physicians for our highly-regarded family medicine residency, where we’d interviewed about 10-15 times more candidates than we had slots for, I was struck by the fact that how far we’d had to go down in our rank-ordering of applicants had nothing to do with the quality of each class.Once we’d weeded out the undesirables and ranked a few superstars, we might as well have taken all the remaining applications and thrown them down a flight of stairs then ranked them in their landing order, starting at the top stair or the bottom one.How one does in organic chemistry as an undergraduate is one of the worst ways I can imagine to decide who gets to be a physician.
1Reaction
Tom Gumprecht, M.D., A.B.I.M., A.B.O.
ENT doctor at Proliance Eastside ENT
1y
- Report this comment
Arlen, the questions you pose are reasonable and thought provoking. But I am already seeing a dumbing down of young doctors to the detriment of doctors and patients. Patients traditionally have had respect for doctors because “they were the best and the brightest.” That is eroded when young doctors have middling smarts and more committed to WOKE agendas that true hard earned excellence. Tom Gumprecht, ABIM, ABO
1Reaction 2Reactions
See more comments
To view or add a comment, sign in
More articles by this author
No more previous content
- Innovation Budhi Sep 5, 2024
- Rumination nation Sep 4, 2024
- Should writing be your side gig? Sep 3, 2024
- Is sick care USA going in the wrong direction? Sep 2, 2024
- Advice to bioengineering graduates applying to medical school Sep 1, 2024
- Creating an international healthcare AI development and education network: HAIDEN Aug 29, 2024
- Creating an international healthcare AI development and education network: HAIDEN Aug 27, 2024
- Strategies for leading medical professional AI education, training and development: closing the gaps Aug 26, 2024
- How should we serve the needs of early-stage sick care information and communications technology (ICT) entrepreneurs? Aug 25, 2024
- Doctors have gone from GPs to PCPs to GPs Aug 22, 2024
No more next content
Sign in
Stay updated on your professional world
Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Insights from the community
- Research How do you become a principal scientist?
- Chemical Engineering How can you teach bioengineering students to apply chemical engineering principles to biological systems?
- Research How can you evaluate the impact of scientific research on education?
- Laboratory Management Here's how you can navigate the differences between being a laboratory manager in academia versus industry.
- Materials Science How can you advance your materials science skills through career development?
- Bioengineering Here's how you can develop the most in-demand skills for entry-level bioengineers.
Others also viewed
- Improving Chemistry Foundations UKZN Alumni 7y
- Transform Your Chemistry Lab Reports: The POGIL Approach to conceptual understanding. George Carrington BSc, Certified Teacher, MSc. Ed 6mo
- A COUNTRY THAT IGNORES SCIENCE ... Regina Kwarteng, PhD 7y
- Celebration of 50 yrs of Teaching of Prof. M. S. wadia on 13th Aug Vaishali Shinde 8y
- DIT Chemistry Education Research Team win prestigious award Claire McDonnell 6y
- Unlocking Insights: CBSE Board Chemistry Exam 2024 Analysis Rahul Nandan 6mo
- Teaching Empirical and Molecular Formulas: A Guide for Online Chemistry Teachers LatinHire 3mo
- TEACHING CHEMISTRY Fatih A. 7y
- Journal of Advances in Education Research, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Feb. 2021) Released Isaac Scientific Publishing 3y
- Student Research Creates Pathway to Success for Chemistry Graduates SciWomen Rutgers 7y
Explore topics
- Sales
- Marketing
- IT Services
- Business Administration
- HR Management
- Engineering
- Soft Skills
- See All