Center for Astronomy Heidelberg - Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics (2024)

Contact | Deutsch

University > ZAH > ITA > Dullemond >

Protoplanetary disks

The dusty gas disks surrounding many young stars are the left-overs ofthe star formation process. These disks are often called"protoplanetary disks" because it is believed that they are thebirthplaces of planets and planetary systems. Our own Solar System wasonce formed from such a disk surrounding the young sun, 4.567 billionyears ago. With powerful telescopes such disks can be observed andstudied around young stars, and we can thus get a glimpse of what ourown pre-planetary solar system looked like at its birth.

In my research I study the structure and evolution of protoplanetarydisks using numerical modeling, and the comparison of these models toobservations. This research involves the study of their viscousevolution and the transport processes happening inside of these disks(e.g. Dullemond, Natta & Testi 2006, Visser& Dullemond 2010). It also involves studying their detailedstructure, in particular the temperature structure (the warm surfacelayer, cool interior, internal heat production, etc, see e.g. Dullemond & Dominik 2004a,Kamp & Dullemond 2004,Min, Dullemond, Kama & Dominik Icarus, submitted as ofNov 2010), which iscomputed using radiative transfer calculations (see my software website for more information about my radiative transfer tools). Anotherimportant aspect that I am interested in is the photoevaporation ofthese disks by the EUV, FUV and X-ray radiation from the star itself(Gorti, Dullemond & Hollenbach 2009).

Using my radiative transfer codes I have also been involved in many observationalcampaigns: To interpret observations of protoplanetary disks and possibly their envelopes in terms of disk models. Most of this work is in fact carried out by my collaborators,who use my codes (RADMC, RADMC-3D) to interpret their data(e.g. Pontoppidan et al. 2007a and 2007b,Andrews et al. 2009and 2010and many more).

Dust coagulation in disks

What originally started as part of my research on disk structuregradually became my new main field of research: the growth of dustgrains in protoplanetary disks due to the process of aggregation (alsooften called coagulation). The original goal was to understand how theopacities change over time in protoplanetary disks, and to be able tounderstand the wealth of solid state features and feature shapes seenin emission in infrared spectra of these disks (ISO, Spitzer, VLT,Keck, etc). We developed models of dust coagulation which we then insert into our radiative transfer tools to make synthetic spectraand images, which can then be compared to observations (early work: Dullemond & Dominik 2005,20042008,Dominik & Dullemond 2008)

However, dust growth is also the very first step in the process ofplanet formation. By 2006 this became the main focus of this research,and my students basically took charge of this. Firstly, FrithjofBrauer managed to design a full-disk-scale dust coagulation modelingcode that is able to evolve the dust throughout the disk including thefragmentation (Brauer,Dullemond & Henning 2008), something which I did not manage todo efficiently in my 2005 paper. He also found a way to overcomethe dreaded "meter size barrier" by trapping particles in a pressure trap (Brauer, Henning & Dullemond 2008).

Subsequently, Til Birnstiel improved Frithjof's model and merged itwith a disk evolution model (Birnstiel,Dullemond & Brauer 2009). Now the model is (almost) complete:it is very efficient (using a fully implicit integration method), itincludes radial drift and mixing as well as growth andfragmentation. In addition to this, he developed semi-analytic modelfits to his results, which can be useful for other modelers ( Birnstiel, Ormel& Dullemond 2010), and applied his model to millimeter wavedata of disk (Birnstiel,Ricci, Trotta, et al. 2010).

At the same time, Andras Zsom worked with the Braunschweig laboratorygroup to develop a new experiment-based dust coagulation kernel(Güttler, Blum, Zsom et al. 2010). It is the first timethat a dust coagulation kernel has been constructed that is basedon the last 10 years of laboratory collision experiments, and thisis thus a major step forward. However, as a result of thiswork they found a new barrier to growth: the "bouncing barrier"(Zsom, Güttler et al. 2010). At the moment we do not yetunderstand how Nature is apparently able to overcome this barrier.

From planetesimals to planets

The work on dust coagulation has led us to ask the question howthe next step proceeds: How are rocky planets formed from swarmsof planetesimals? Chris Ormel, a Humboldt postdoctoral Fellow linked to our group, has developed an ingenious new methodfor modeling this problem. It is a Monte Carlo method thatcarefully deals with the transition from runaway growth tooligarchic growth (Ormel, Dullemond & Spaans 2010). This method is particularly powerful in that it can span a huge range in planetesimal size, by use of a clever grouping method.

We are currently moving more and more in this (for us new)direction, and we have the ultimate goal of modeling rockyplanet formation all the way from dust to planets. In thenext few years I hope to be able to report on many newresults in this area.

Radiative transfer

I spend some amount of my time on developing radiative transfertools. This is not really my "research" field. It is meant as acrucial tool to link our models to direct observations of the objectswe study. So, to ensure also in the future a smooth linkeage betweenour models of disks and dust on the one hand and direct observationsof our objects on the other hand, I spend time on updating my radiativetransfer tool set.

It has turned out, however, that many other scientists also haveinterest in using these tools. I have therefore decided that I spend considerable effort in making these tools easy-to-use andwell-documented, and publically available. I see this as a serviceto the community.

Collaboration with others at the ZAH

Planet formation is strongly linked to the process of star formation.At the ITA there is a strong expertise on this topic in the starformation groupof Ralf Klessen. For this reason, and because of my expertise in3-D radiative transfer, I collaborate strongly with his star formationgroup.

I am also setting up a collaboration with RainerSpurzem on N-body modeling of planetesimals and planets duringplanet formation.

I hope to be setting up more collaborations with people at the ZAH in themonths/years to come.

Responsible: Cornelis Petrus Dullemond, last modification Mar/17/2013 18:29 CET

Center for Astronomy Heidelberg - Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics (2024)

FAQs

What is the difference between astrophysics and theoretical astrophysics? ›

In summary, Astrophysics and Theoretical Physics are two separate branches of physics, with astrophysics focusing on the study of the universe and theoretical physics focusing on mathematical models and theories. Many astrophysicists are theorists, but there are also experimental aspects to the field.

What does a theoretical astrophysicist do? ›

Theorists in the astrophysics division use combinations of calculations, simulations, and observations to characterize and understand astrophysical phenomena on a wide range of scales, ranging from exoplanets, black holes, and neutron stars, to the dynamics of stars and galaxies, all the way to the universe at large.

What does a theoretical astronomer do? ›

Observational astronomers view celestial objects and collect data on them. Theoretical astronomers analyze, model, and speculate about systems and how they work and evolve.

What is the difference between observational and theoretical astrophysics? ›

Observation provides real-world data about how stars, galaxies, and other objects in space behave. Theory connects that data together into a full understanding, and makes predictions about phenomena we haven't observed yet.

Is astrophysics the hardest degree? ›

Astrophysics demands a deep understanding of advanced mathematical concepts and analytical skills to interpret vast amounts of astronomical data. Moreover, students must develop theoretical models to explain observed phenomena. The complex and vast subject area makes it one of the toughest courses in the world.

Is astrophysics high paying? ›

The average Astrophysicist in the US makes $140,371. Astrophysicists make the most in San Jose, CA at $277,146 averaging total compensation 97% greater than US average.

Do you need a PhD to be an astrophysicist? ›

What Kind of Education Do Astrophysicists Need? To be an astrophysicist, one must hold a Ph. D. in either physics or astronomy.

How much money does a theoretical physicist make? ›

Theoretical Physicist Salary
Annual SalaryMonthly Pay
Top Earners$176,000$14,666
75th Percentile$112,000$9,333
Average$94,805$7,900
25th Percentile$59,000$4,916

Do astrophysicists work at NASA? ›

The multidisciplinarity of the workforce at NASA (astrophysicists, astrochemists, chemists, physicists, planetary scientists, theoreticians, astronomers) makes it a unique environment for doing Laboratory Astrophysics research.

Do astronomers make good money? ›

As of Jun 30, 2024, the average hourly pay for an Astronomer in the United States is $26.34 an hour. While ZipRecruiter is seeing hourly wages as high as $61.78 and as low as $8.89, the majority of Astronomer wages currently range between $15.14 (25th percentile) to $30.77 (75th percentile) across the United States.

What is the highest salary of an astronomer? ›

Average Astronomer Salary in India
  • Base Salary. ₹102k - ₹3m.
  • Bonus. ₹2k - ₹147k.
  • Profit Sharing. ₹2k - ₹25k.
  • Commission. ₹0 - ₹26k.
  • Total Pay. ₹111k - ₹3m.

What degree do most astronomers have? ›

Most research astronomers have doctorate degrees in physics or astronomy and also bachelor's and/or master's degrees in a physical science, usually physics or astronomy. It takes about 10 years of education beyond normal high school education to become a research astronomer.

What are the three types of astrophysics? ›

Types of astrophysics
  • Radio astronomy.
  • Optical astronomy.
  • Infrared astronomy.
  • Ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma-ray astronomy using space telescopes.

Can a theoretical physicist work at NASA? ›

Michele Vallisneri is a theoretical physicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and visiting faculty at the California Institute of Technology, where he obtained his Ph. D in 2002.

How do you get into theoretical astrophysics? ›

Theoretical Research in Astrophysics

To work as a theoretical astrophysicist, a candidate needs a bachelor's degree in Engineering and Technology field. A student with a master's degree in physics knowing mathematics can also go for theoretical research for the course.

What is the highest degree in astrophysics? ›

To be an astrophysicist, one must hold a Ph. D. in either physics or astronomy. Undergraduates should aim for a bachelor's degree in physics as a stepping stone, although some universities do offer degrees in astronomy.

How do you become a theoretical astrophysicist? ›

You need at least a master's degree to become an astrophysicist, though many employers require a doctoral degree. Students can expect to take courses in engineering, physics, astronomy and other science courses. Students need to first complete a bachelor's degree with a major in astrophysics or a similar field.

What is the difference between theoretical and experimental astrophysics? ›

Renowned theoretical physicists Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking are famous for developing theories about how the universe works. Experimentalists, on the other hand, are responsible for designing experiments using observation to either prove or disprove theories.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rob Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 5241

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rob Wisoky

Birthday: 1994-09-30

Address: 5789 Michel Vista, West Domenic, OR 80464-9452

Phone: +97313824072371

Job: Education Orchestrator

Hobby: Lockpicking, Crocheting, Baton twirling, Video gaming, Jogging, Whittling, Model building

Introduction: My name is Rob Wisoky, I am a smiling, helpful, encouraging, zealous, energetic, faithful, fantastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.